Comments on: The Object-Document Mismatch: MongoDB and db4o with Linq http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/ Freshly Draught Code Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:03:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: One day with Mongo DB | Gokul's Blog http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/comment-page-1/#comment-2094 One day with Mongo DB | Gokul's Blog Sun, 17 Jul 2011 03:49:49 +0000 http://www.emphess.net/?p=232#comment-2094 [...] http://blog.wekeroad.com/2010/03/04/using-mongo-with-linq http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/ http://www.michaelckennedy.net/blog/2010/04/22/TheNoSQLMovementLINQAndMongoDBOhMy.aspx [...] [...] http://blog.wekeroad.com/2010/03/04/using-mongo-with-linq http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/ http://www.michaelckennedy.net/blog/2010/04/22/TheNoSQLMovementLINQAndMongoDBOhMy.aspx [...]

]]> By: Christoph Menge http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/comment-page-1/#comment-2038 Christoph Menge Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:52:45 +0000 http://www.emphess.net/?p=232#comment-2038 Hi Stefan, thanks a lot for your feedback and the clarification! After one month, I finally managed to correct the actual text - sorry for the delay. Best, Chris Hi Stefan,

thanks a lot for your feedback and the clarification! After one month, I finally managed to correct the actual text – sorry for the delay.

Best,
Chris

]]> By: Stefan Edlich http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/comment-page-1/#comment-2023 Stefan Edlich Thu, 20 May 2010 11:59:57 +0000 http://www.emphess.net/?p=232#comment-2023 Dear Christoph, very nice writeup! But one sentence is not quite correct. You wrote: "MongoDB is considered a NoSQL solution, while db4o is not." And the "is not" references to my website http://nosql-database.org (#2 in Google right after the Wikipedia). But as you can see db4o is clearly listed under this website. I put db4o in the category "soft" nosql (which is nosql). The rational to put Systems like db4o or XML Databases to the "soft" nosql and not the "core" nosql is explained in my onaswer on this blog: http://www.kellblog.com/2010/04/11/yes-virginia-marklogic-is-a-nosql-system/ I have been a part of the db4o team since 2003/04 and I would have a lot of reasons to support db4o (e.g. The Definitive Guide book by Apress). But the categories under the nosql websites and the listing for db4o and for all is quite fair I assume. Best Regards Stefan Edlich Dear Christoph,

very nice writeup!

But one sentence is not quite correct. You wrote:
“MongoDB is considered a NoSQL solution, while db4o is not.”
And the “is not” references to my website http://nosql-database.org
(#2 in Google right after the Wikipedia).

But as you can see db4o is clearly listed under this website.
I put db4o in the category “soft” nosql (which is nosql).
The rational to put Systems like db4o or XML Databases to the
“soft” nosql and not the “core” nosql is explained in my onaswer on
this blog: http://www.kellblog.com/2010/04/11/yes-virginia-marklogic-is-a-nosql-system/

I have been a part of the db4o team since 2003/04 and I would have a lot
of reasons to support db4o (e.g. The Definitive Guide book by Apress).
But the categories under the nosql websites and the listing for db4o and for all is quite fair I assume.

Best Regards
Stefan Edlich

]]>