<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for emphess .NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emphess.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emphess.net</link>
	<description>Christoph Menge&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Object-Document Mismatch: MongoDB and db4o with Linq by Christoph Menge</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Menge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=232#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>Hi Stefan,

thanks a lot for your feedback and the clarification! After one month, I finally managed to correct the actual text - sorry for the delay.

Best,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stefan,</p>
<p>thanks a lot for your feedback and the clarification! After one month, I finally managed to correct the actual text &#8211; sorry for the delay.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Simple Standalone Server for db4o as Windows Service by Christoph Menge</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/01/23/a-simple-standalone-server-for-db4o-as-windows-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Menge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=73#comment-2037</guid>
		<description>Dear Emerson,

that is a very generic error message - honestly, I think the server crashes on start. That could be because of a newer version of db4o dlls (the code is now half a year old and makes quite a bit of assumptions), or because some security issue like inaccessible file, user not authorized to open sockets, etc. Have you checked whether the config file is ok for you, i.e. whether paths are ok?

This server is rudimentary - there is practically no error checking or logging going on, which is a very bad idea when it comes to debugging or even production use. The idea was mainly to show how to get a windows service up and running.
You might want to add some larger `try{ }` blocks and write Exceptions to the log - that might help in finding the error.

Sorry this isn&#039;t too helpful, but there are too many potential errors.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Emerson,</p>
<p>that is a very generic error message &#8211; honestly, I think the server crashes on start. That could be because of a newer version of db4o dlls (the code is now half a year old and makes quite a bit of assumptions), or because some security issue like inaccessible file, user not authorized to open sockets, etc. Have you checked whether the config file is ok for you, i.e. whether paths are ok?</p>
<p>This server is rudimentary &#8211; there is practically no error checking or logging going on, which is a very bad idea when it comes to debugging or even production use. The idea was mainly to show how to get a windows service up and running.<br />
You might want to add some larger `try{ }` blocks and write Exceptions to the log &#8211; that might help in finding the error.</p>
<p>Sorry this isn&#8217;t too helpful, but there are too many potential errors.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Simple Standalone Server for db4o as Windows Service by Emerson Rodrigues</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/01/23/a-simple-standalone-server-for-db4o-as-windows-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerson Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=73#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>Dear Christoph,

I try your solution, but when I start the server service, windows send me this error:
&quot;the db4oServer service on Local Computer started and then stopped. Some services stop automatically if they have no work to do, for example, the Performance Logs and Alerts service&quot;.
Do you have any ideia of this ???

thank´s

PS: I came from Brazil. Excusime my english.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Christoph,</p>
<p>I try your solution, but when I start the server service, windows send me this error:<br />
&#8220;the db4oServer service on Local Computer started and then stopped. Some services stop automatically if they have no work to do, for example, the Performance Logs and Alerts service&#8221;.<br />
Do you have any ideia of this ???</p>
<p>thank´s</p>
<p>PS: I came from Brazil. Excusime my english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Object-Document Mismatch: MongoDB and db4o with Linq by Stefan Edlich</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/05/05/the-object-document-mismatch-mongodb-and-db4o-with-linq/comment-page-1/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Edlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 11:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=232#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>Dear Christoph,

very nice writeup!

But one sentence is not quite correct. You wrote:
&quot;MongoDB is considered a NoSQL solution, while db4o is not.&quot;
And the &quot;is not&quot; references to my website http://nosql-database.org
(#2 in Google right after the Wikipedia).

But as you can see db4o is clearly listed under this website.
I put db4o in the category &quot;soft&quot; nosql (which is nosql).
The rational to put Systems like db4o or XML Databases to the
&quot;soft&quot; nosql and not the &quot;core&quot; nosql is explained in my onaswer on
this blog: http://www.kellblog.com/2010/04/11/yes-virginia-marklogic-is-a-nosql-system/

I have been a part of the db4o team since 2003/04 and I would have a lot 
of reasons to support db4o (e.g. The Definitive Guide book by Apress).
But the categories under the nosql websites and the listing for db4o and for all is quite fair I assume.

Best Regards
Stefan Edlich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Christoph,</p>
<p>very nice writeup!</p>
<p>But one sentence is not quite correct. You wrote:<br />
&#8220;MongoDB is considered a NoSQL solution, while db4o is not.&#8221;<br />
And the &#8220;is not&#8221; references to my website <a href="http://nosql-database.org" rel="nofollow">http://nosql-database.org</a><br />
(#2 in Google right after the Wikipedia).</p>
<p>But as you can see db4o is clearly listed under this website.<br />
I put db4o in the category &#8220;soft&#8221; nosql (which is nosql).<br />
The rational to put Systems like db4o or XML Databases to the<br />
&#8220;soft&#8221; nosql and not the &#8220;core&#8221; nosql is explained in my onaswer on<br />
this blog: <a href="http://www.kellblog.com/2010/04/11/yes-virginia-marklogic-is-a-nosql-system/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kellblog.com/2010/04/11/yes-virginia-marklogic-is-a-nosql-system/</a></p>
<p>I have been a part of the db4o team since 2003/04 and I would have a lot<br />
of reasons to support db4o (e.g. The Definitive Guide book by Apress).<br />
But the categories under the nosql websites and the listing for db4o and for all is quite fair I assume.</p>
<p>Best Regards<br />
Stefan Edlich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on db4o Queries on Large Datasets and a bit of Linq by db4o Performance Pitfalls &#124; emphess .NET</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/03/16/db4o-queries-on-large-datasets-and-a-bit-of-linq/comment-page-1/#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>db4o Performance Pitfalls &#124; emphess .NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=123#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>[...] There have been some important changes in builds past 14021, see my more recent post on that topic. In short, the new kid in town is Mono.Reflection.dll, which took Cecil&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There have been some important changes in builds past 14021, see my more recent post on that topic. In short, the new kid in town is Mono.Reflection.dll, which took Cecil&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zuckerberg&#8217;s Keynote at  f8 Facebook Developer Conference by Christoph Menge</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/04/21/zuckerbergs-keynote-at-f8-facebook-developer-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Menge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=198#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>d, thanks for the comment! 

My bad - in English it&#039;s &quot;Gulf&quot; region. Since the German words for &quot;Gulf&quot; and &quot;Golf&quot; are both &quot;Golf&quot;, it&#039;s a good example in German but obviously not in English :( Well, another thing facebook would know, right? I removed the region, but now the example isn&#039;t too convincing. Any suggestions for ambiguous words? Wikipedia suggests &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Mercury&quot;&lt;/a&gt; as a particularly ambiguous word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>d, thanks for the comment! </p>
<p>My bad &#8211; in English it&#8217;s &#8220;Gulf&#8221; region. Since the German words for &#8220;Gulf&#8221; and &#8220;Golf&#8221; are both &#8220;Golf&#8221;, it&#8217;s a good example in German but obviously not in English <img src='http://www.emphess.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Well, another thing facebook would know, right? I removed the region, but now the example isn&#8217;t too convincing. Any suggestions for ambiguous words? Wikipedia suggests <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Mercury&#8221;</a> as a particularly ambiguous word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zuckerberg&#8217;s Keynote at  f8 Facebook Developer Conference by d</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/04/21/zuckerbergs-keynote-at-f8-facebook-developer-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=198#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>great article. but what is the &quot;golf&quot; region?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article. but what is the &#8220;golf&#8221; region?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on db4o Queries on Large Datasets and a bit of Linq by My db4o Wishlist &#124; emphess .NET</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/03/16/db4o-queries-on-large-datasets-and-a-bit-of-linq/comment-page-1/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>My db4o Wishlist &#124; emphess .NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=123#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t run SODA when no more constraints are present I blogged about this already, because you experience this in very common scenarios, namely whenever you query a small subset of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t run SODA when no more constraints are present I blogged about this already, because you experience this in very common scenarios, namely whenever you query a small subset of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NoSQL Approaches: Trying to use db4o in the Real World by My db4o Wishlist &#124; emphess .NET</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/04/12/nosql-approaches-trying-to-use-db4o-in-the-real-world/comment-page-1/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>My db4o Wishlist &#124; emphess .NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=138#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>[...] finding that db4o did not screw up in our projects, I dug a bit through their issue tracker, which is a very important resource you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] finding that db4o did not screw up in our projects, I dug a bit through their issue tracker, which is a very important resource you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NoSQL Approaches: Trying to use db4o in the Real World by Christoph Menge</title>
		<link>http://www.emphess.net/2010/04/12/nosql-approaches-trying-to-use-db4o-in-the-real-world/comment-page-1/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Menge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphess.net/?p=138#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>Mike, thanks for the kind words. I will definitely take a look at other object databases - it can&#039;t hurt to have some overview of the market and how the typical problems are approached by different teams. I wonder how Caché approaches lists and m:n relationships, for example.

As to the discussion of relational vs. structured (and the terminology issue of whether object databases are a subset of &#039;NoSQL&#039; or not), I believe we see some strange trench warfare at the moment. 

There is no silver bullet, and I doubt people really believe that. However, adding some fuel to the fire can be fun :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, thanks for the kind words. I will definitely take a look at other object databases &#8211; it can&#8217;t hurt to have some overview of the market and how the typical problems are approached by different teams. I wonder how Caché approaches lists and m:n relationships, for example.</p>
<p>As to the discussion of relational vs. structured (and the terminology issue of whether object databases are a subset of &#8216;NoSQL&#8217; or not), I believe we see some strange trench warfare at the moment. </p>
<p>There is no silver bullet, and I doubt people really believe that. However, adding some fuel to the fire can be fun <img src='http://www.emphess.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
